Those were also in twitch, to which my contribution was "Claws of the foxgirls! The foxgirls are upon you!" (Which would sound cooler in Khuzdul of course, but I don't know how to say "fox" let alone "foxgirl". )
You are im_done, and I claim my five pounds.
Like I've been trying to get across for the past five threads or so, you "creeper" folks will be wishing he was a garden variety pervert before this plays out, unless I am vastly underestimating Fred's ability and desire to go meta.Teddy-Werebear wrote: ↑Mon Feb 18, 2019 12:01 amI stand by my douche chills for Dr. Feelgood. He is a creeper.
Yes, someone who sexually abuses the underage is horrific, and deserves death at least. Someone who is perfectly normal in their personal proclivities, clocks out from Sony and goes home to a nice boring evening with his perfectly normal wife, but professionally has no problem condemning (again to paraphrase Guinan) "generations" of artificial humans to lives of servitude (whether just "emotional" as the EDS pamphlets wax about, or sexual as would inevitably be the case) -- what about them? Imagining an individual (or few) "real" human victims, and directing you ire at the perpetrator, is pretty easy. Working up a similar level of ire on behalf of an unknown (but large if Sony gets their way) number of "fake" people, and directing it at people or organizations who almost certainly aren't even breaking any laws is going to prove much more problematic. Like I said last thread, Ashe did not break her phone just because Fred couldn't come up with anything cool for her to say.
I jokingly called her Teal'c on twitch -- strong silent type, ha ha -- but no. She is The Lorax.
Does the "accessory" have a choice in the matter?
Does the "accessory" deserve a choice in the matter?
I mean a real choice, not a "choice" they have been hard-wired to believe they have (while other hard-wiring completely constrains the outcome of the "choosing").
Who gets to decide that Ping is "*not* a 'real' girl"? By what right and on what grounds do they get to make that decision?
EDIT:
"how to properly date a 'real' girl"
These guys will teach men how to properly date a "real" girl, where "properly" is defined as the guy getting what he wants while convincing the girl she is getting what she wants.
Why is that a bad thing? Is Sony defining "properly" in the original sentence, or do the "''real' girls" in question have any say in that definition?