| Megatokyo |
Help
Search
Members
Calendar
|
| Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register ) | Resend Validation Email |
| Pages: (2) All 1 [2] ( Go to first unread post ) | ![]() ![]() ![]() |
| charliepanayi |
Posted: Mar 2 2012, 01:59 PM
|
![]() Local ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: -Members- Posts: 193 Member No.: 23408 Joined: 26-January 04 |
I seriously doubt Pixar are going to suddenly start using Shrek's riffing on popular culture as a template.
|
| Zandra |
Posted: Mar 4 2012, 08:12 PM
|
|
Local ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: -Members- Posts: 195 Member No.: 67343 Joined: 3-August 09 |
SHE SPLIT HIS ARROW IN TWAIN!!! Stand back! this calls for Patriot arrow mark 3!!
|
| errantrogue |
Posted: Mar 4 2012, 10:07 PM
|
||
![]() Captain? ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Active Members Posts: 12464 Member No.: 37041 Joined: 4-January 05 |
Umm... have you SEEN Cars 2? One giant Larry the Cable Guy movie is pretty close to the intellectual equivalent. The only real difference is the level of detail in the art. |
||
| charliepanayi |
Posted: Mar 5 2012, 01:56 PM
|
||
![]() Local ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: -Members- Posts: 193 Member No.: 23408 Joined: 26-January 04 |
No I didn't see it as I heard it wasn't very good and we all know they only made it for the merchandising cash. As such I disregard it. |
||
| omoikane |
Posted: Mar 5 2012, 03:08 PM
|
||
|
♪mojimoji shite kimoi ne♪ Group: Super Moderators Posts: 63685 Member No.: 14 Joined: 30-September 00 |
i still don't know where you get this legitimacy notion from. unless it's historical fiction or recreation it's not legit at all. |
||
| shoeboxjeddy |
Posted: Mar 5 2012, 09:25 PM
|
||
![]() Still accepting applications~ ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Active Members Posts: 6326 Member No.: 45553 Joined: 12-October 05 |
Well whoa whoa whoa. In structure, it was more of a Spy Hard or Johnny English or Get Smart type deal. It just made the (rather major) mistake of assuming anyone would enjoy it if the main character was Larry the Cable Guy. |
||
| omoikane |
Posted: Mar 6 2012, 09:33 PM
|
|
♪mojimoji shite kimoi ne♪ Group: Super Moderators Posts: 63685 Member No.: 14 Joined: 30-September 00 |
|
| Kegluneq |
Posted: Mar 7 2012, 12:16 AM
|
||
![]() 'X' never, ever marks the spot Group: Moderators Posts: 14672 Member No.: 6290 Joined: 28-October 02 |
Princess Mononoke 3D? That was pretty awesome, if a bit spoileriffic. Billy Connelly's character's new voice is hilarious. |
||
| Vallen Chaos Valiant |
Posted: Apr 4 2012, 12:24 AM
|
||
|
Senior l33t One ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Active Members Posts: 3450 Member No.: 491 Joined: 12-September 01 |
I guess my problem with the "Independent women can't fall in love" is that it actually supports sexism. That was the entire reason why women lost their independence to begin with. "We need women to breed or the species will die out, and if that means stopping them acting independently then so be it". I just don't see how the story would be anything but stereotypical, if the moral of the story is "only women who act like men are allowed to be independent". We know that already; that's the standard social order for centuries. Sexism practically use that principle as its main building blocks. I want to see Brave as a movie about a rebellious woman who wants to make her own rules. But I see any ending where she considers romance unacceptable as just another path well travelled. It's not her own rules any more if everyone else does it. EDIT: Now that I saw the JP trailer, I feel like my post was a waste of time. She obviously have better things to do than pursuing romance in this movie. So my worries are rather irrelevant. I blame the English trailer for being vague. This post has been edited by Vallen Chaos Valiant on Apr 4 2012, 12:51 AM |
||
| shoeboxjeddy |
Posted: Apr 4 2012, 03:09 AM
|
||
![]() Still accepting applications~ ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Active Members Posts: 6326 Member No.: 45553 Joined: 12-October 05 |
Well... examine what you just said. What is "acting like a man" exactly? Fighting? Being strong? Not caring about families or love? THAT is effing sexism man. As long as you have it in your head that "guy things" are being strong and sports and "girl things" are love and princesses, you're going to be not much help in the discussion. Guys are interested in love. Women are interested in being heroic and important. So no, her choice for love or not love is not a positive or negative right off the bat. It's how the situation develops and what comes of it. If she retains her agency and whatnot, love is well fine. If she's a "brave hero warrior" before and a "loving mother" afterwards, even that COULD be fine. But it certainly has a stink to it just from the periphery. |
||
| stageninja |
Posted: Apr 6 2012, 11:38 AM
|
![]() I'm a pony now. Ponies are cool. ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Active Members Posts: 5922 Member No.: 18430 Joined: 3-September 03 |
In comment to media where men are portrayed as one-dimensional figures with no outside motivation, I can think of two examples immediately.
Sidney Bristow's handler in the Alias tv series And the guy from Enchanted It goes to show how emotionally invested I got in these characters when I can't even remember their names. Although an amusing novelty (dudes in distress who have little discernable personality outside of their attachment to their love interest), I don't think it makes for a better story. On anachronisms, I would add that there are instances when an anachronism stew can be applied effectively. Batman: The Animated Series comes to mind with the gender views of the 90s but cars and clothes that resembled earlier time periods. However, being a fictitious place lent itself to that, much the way fantasy movies do, I think. |
| -sam |
Posted: Apr 6 2012, 12:36 PM
|
||
|
Trapped by paradoxes ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Active Members Posts: 6099 Member No.: 3659 Joined: 17-August 02 |
Vaughn, though later revealed to actually be named Alain Vignault or some such shit, I lost track of the show in the last season. Still kinda blows my mind that Bradley Cooper was the dorky platonic friend in that. |
||
| Kegluneq |
Posted: Aug 28 2012, 10:48 AM
|
![]() 'X' never, ever marks the spot Group: Moderators Posts: 14672 Member No.: 6290 Joined: 28-October 02 |
So, saw the film yesterday. It was pretty enjoyable - not at the same level of depth or originality as Toy Story, Wall-E, Up, or Ratatouille, but still better than Cars. As expected there were quite a lot of generic 'Celtic' nods in the art design (and a hefty dose of Princess Mononoke), but despite my earlier grousing it did actually work very well. The core cast (Merida and her parents) are well written, and support a surprisingly large number of 'mute' characters.
I don't imagine it'll get a sequel, but I think there's room for the setting to develop if it did (as well as an extended cast who play minor roles here). Not only does it show that Pixar can do female protagonists, but also that they can do non-American leads as well. |
Pages: (2) All 1 [2] |
![]() ![]() ![]() |